Appendix 1. The Grail Symbol
1st Excerpt from From Grail Christianity to Rudolf Steiner’s Anthroposophy
In my book How the Grail Sites were found – Wolfram von Eschenbach and the Reality of the Grail the thought was already expressed that Wolfram’s Grail can be compared with the cosmic foundation stone of the earth. An expert in the history of the earth’s evolution asked in this context, if this foundation stone was perhaps the human being. We regard this question as justified, because the human being as the image of God or as a reflection of the Cosmos, as a microcosm could very well be viewed as the foundation stone of the entire evolution of the earth. But let us leave this question open and first examine Wolfram’s information concerning the Grail…
The Grail in Kyot’s factual report (Parzival) is definitely not the dish of the Last Supper, neither is it a cup, but exclusively that fully defined stone, of which we believe today that Wolfram in his Parzival called it lapsit exillîs (P. 469:7). This term, however, cannot be right for the following reasons: Wolfram never fails to elaborate a concept, if it is not clearly understandable. Quite often he leaves us over long stretches in doubt about something, but when the proper time comes he enlightens us fully (P. 453:1-10). This pedagogical-didactic method is a symptom par excellence for recognizing Wolfram’s style.
The concept lapsit exillîs, which nobody understands anymore, is never mentioned by Wolfram again. It can hardly be argued that he, the exact historian, wants to purposefully keep us in the dark of all things about the nature of the Grail stone, which is indeed the most important element of the whole history of the Grail. When Wolfram does not elaborate on an unknown concept, it may be concluded that it requires no additional elaboration. Since Wolfram does not explain it in this concrete case, it can only mean that the stone has another name. Wolfram must have used a concept that required no further explanation.
As a matter of fact, there are beside the concept lapsit two other traditional names for the Grail. The (handwritten) manuscript “d” reads lapis, which is just as puzzling as lapsis. The manuscript “gg”, on the other hand, contains a concept which Wolfram, and with him the rest of the world, uses to denote a semi-precious stone. This stone is called iaspis (P. 469:7, note). Of all the traditional names of the Grail the concept jasper (High German: Jaspis) is the only one that requires no additional explanation, because it is generally known. We have no reason in this point for not following the manuscript “gg”.
Although we now know that the Grail is a stone called jasper, we have no insight yet into the connection between this semi-precious stone and the supreme Grail symbol. We must first get to know this stone better.
The mineralogist reckons jasper together with hornblende and firestone (flint) to the class of chalcedony. The formula for the jasper material is SiO2, i.e. silicium-dioxide or silicic acid. The stone is amorphous, has a mussel-like crease, shines pale or wax-like on the surface and gleams like glass when polished. It cannot be melted down and like quartz it is insoluble in acids. It is assumed that during rock formation boil-like hollow spaces were formed that were filled, through spinning holes, with silicic acid. This silicic acid would then later have petrified into pebbles of stone.
The neutral jasper has a milky grey colour. Depending on its mixture with metals, it changes colour and depending on the colour, it also changes its name. When yellow-brown it is called cornelian. With white or black layers, its name is onyx. The sardonyx has brown- or black-white layers. When the stone is brown or reddish to honey-yellow transparent, it is called sardius. This honey wax brown jasper, which is found in India, is called that way, because it was imported in antiquity from the city of Sardis, the fifth apocalyptic family in Asia, to Greece, where it was especially used for the production of engraved gems. Engraved gems were also cut from differently coloured jasper. What is remarkable about jasper is that its delicate layers are not laid parallel to the earth’s gravity. The misty layers were rather laid as concentric spheres around a core. The whole jasper bulb is not only shaped like an egg, but also, like an egg enclosed by its shell, covered by a white skin. Its inner structure of delicately tinted layers can only be recognized when jasper is cut. A cross-section shows in fact, in the style of the organic-biological realm, the picture with which the astronomers from antiquity and the Middle Ages represented the world of the planets. They pictured this archetypal cosmic egg, like the stone jasper, composed of more or less concentric spheres. On the surface of polished jasper can be recognized, in addition to a clearly visible spherical system around a dark core, a second identical, but somewhat less clearly drawn system, which is laid in lighter veils around a lighter core. If one sees in such markings an archetype of the planetary system, we would have two systems within jasper that, like the heliocentric and the geocentric planetary systems, fill in a common frame. Both systems interpenetrate without disturbing each other. Such a system is physically inconceivable. It can only come about when two qualitatively different force fields, which structure the original protein-like matter, are active in the same space. This is only possible in the case of living beings.
Just as there are eggs on rare occasions with two yolks, there are also jasper bulbs with two such double systems. With this type of abnormality, each system influences the sphere of the other. Lemniscate shapes are formed by such abnormal twins. Such sheaths inwardly structured by morphic fields can only have an organic nature.
We shall now look in still more detail at the spatial form of jasper. Jasper is, like an egg, an ellipsoid. But it is not a rotational ellipsoid that can be turned around on its sectional axis. An egg is defined by two axes. The third spatial axis has the same size as the second one. One cross-section in a right angle to the sectional axis is always circular. With jasper such a cross-section is ellipsoidal. The third axis is shorter than the second one. We therefore call such a spatial form a triple axis ellipsoid.
The form also changes, with the exception of deviations, depending on the axial relation. Jasper can be bulky or almost spherical; it can also have long or thin shape or be more or less flat. We can recognize jasper always by its shape as a triple axis ellipsoid, but because of the various relations between the lengths of the axes, an infinite number of jasper shapes have been formed in nature. Its shapes and sizes are so variable that, in contrast to an egg, no jasper stone is ever the same. Each jasper stone has – and here the expression may be used – an individual form.
The most beautiful form is felt to be the one where the axial relations correspond to the golden section, i.e. if the ratio between the smallest and the middle axis is equal to the ratio between the middle and the greatest axis.
I had the opportunity of studying the jasper reserves in the coral atoll of Isteinerklotz at the place in Germany where it is mined. Sometimes fractures of jasper bulbs are also found there, which are baked around and about in lime. This leads to the conclusion that before it petrified, jasper must have had a jelly-like consistency. The surface of the fractures is mussel-like, of the sort that comes about when soft organic jelly or gel matter (aspic) is broken.
While studying these jasper reserves, I became convinced that the jasper inside the coral atoll of the Isteinerklotz must have lived in whole colonies. These living beings had not as yet formed any physiologically recognizable bodily organs. Jasper was, simply put, a “vitalized sheath”, i.e. an organic complex at the stage of an archetypal organism with its gel-like body of protein enclosed by an egg-like skin. These liquid creatures enclosed by a glassy transparent but malleable skin inhabited the lagoon of the coral atoll. They floated about in the water or watery mist like jellyfish today in the sea and nourished themselves with the micro-organisms from their environment. When they died, their corpses sank to the mineralised bottom where they became embedded in the lime banks of the deceased micro-organisms.
This vitalized sheath as the archetype of the organic-biological-earthly realm would, physically speaking, not be a bad symbol for a group of people following Grail objectives. The Grail family strove not only to perform physical research into nature, but also research into the super-sensible formative forces that generate nature. A petrified organism that is similar to the archetype of the formative forces body (ether body) would in this sense be an inspiring Grail symbol. Jasper would then also fulfil Wolfram’s condition that it be in existence since the time of Adam.
This is an indication of the direction that research must take to discover something concrete in Wolfram’s Grail symbol. During this quest it will turn out that the stone mined in the Isteinerklotz area and popularly called jasper, is not called jasper in mineralogical terms, but Neolithic silica (formerly silex). We are striving to broaden this concept, and with the name jasper we denote all semi-precious stones whose nature is organic and which on the basis of their structure are “vitalized sheaths”. In this sense, not only our jasper or Neolithic silica would be a sort of jasper, but also chrisopas, sardius, sardonyx and onyx.
The philologist could object here that the question concerning jasper merely appears to be resolved in such a simple fashion, because only half of this mysterious concept has been explained. Wolfram’s stone is not just called jasper. His concept includes a second word: exillîs, which is such a riddle that until now nobody has given it any concrete meaning, even though whole books have been written about it since Albrecht von Scharfenberg designated the stone “Jasper from the Heights”.
I have to admit that none of the manuscripts known to me give a clear and concise meaning for this second word. Unfortunately, I cannot indicate the right name in such a simple manner as was done in the first part with the concept jasper or iaspis (P. 469:7 in the manuscript ‘gg’).
We have already come across the name jasper. The miraculous bed in which Gawain had to fight his battle in Schastel Marveil, rolled on a polished jointless floor composed of (P. 566:21-22):
Jaspis, von crisolte, | Jasper, of chrysolite
Von sardîn, als er wolte | Of sardius according to wish.
What we have here are the Middle High German names for the above-mentioned semi-precious stone jasper, chrisopas and sardius. Iaspis is the Latin form of the Middle High German jaspis. The whole concept must hence be Latin.
If we assume that the second part specifies the first, then there are good mineralogical reasons for thinking of the substance, of which jasper or Neolithic silica is made. This is silica or flint with the chemical formula SiO2 = silicium-dioxide. In English, the stone could be called flint jasper or jasper from silica, or in Wolfram’s Latin: iaspis ex silex. I suspect that Kyot called the stone in Latin iaspis ex silice, but that the wording became more and more French in the course of tradition (oral history). There are semantic grounds for this. The Latin ex silice, pronounced in French (ce becomes phonetically s), is now called ex silisse or ex sillîs. Rhymed with Fenix (Phoenix) it is then called ex silix, which could very well be in line with Wolfram’s representation.
I hereby request philological experts to assist me and to come forward with professional, properly formulated evidence. I did not come to this solution from the philological aspect, but from the mineralogical one. Above all, I have absolute confidence in Wolfram’s historical sensibility. I know his character and also his semantic idiosyncrasies. He would have elaborated on the concept, if it could not have been understood in a completely self-evident manner. I am convinced that it is right to identify the Grail or the stone iaspis (P. 468:7) as iaspis ex silice or ex sillix, thus as jasper made of silica.
The mystic will criticize this – in his eyes – profane treatment of the supreme Grail symbol. We beg him to exercise a little more patience. The physical stone made of silica is only a symbol for the real Grail. The Grail itself is not a physical object, but the supreme aim in life of the Grail family. But the Grail symbol as a physical object is already something very special.
Our idea to treat jasper or iaspis ex silice as a petrified organism or fossil is not yet current today. It is assumed that jasper originated “physically” or “by itself”. If this were the case, the Grail family would hardly have chosen such jasper to be the central symbol for their aspirations. The Grail family wanted to view the world in such a way that the primordial ideas underlying the creation of nature could be recognized. The Grail seekers aspired to decipher the meaning of nature and to organize their life in harmony with the intentions of the Creator.
Whoever would like to get to the bottom of this is asked to turn to an expert in the realm of “organic evolution”. We refer in this professional field of genesis to the life work of the natural biologist Gunther Wachsmuth. This close colleague of Rudolf Steiner made a scientific study of the evolution of the cosmos, the earth and the human being and has described the evolution of the organic-living realm due to the etheric formative forces. It was he who coined the words “vitalized sheath” (German: Vitalisierte Hülle) used here for the evolutionary phase in question. Wachsmuth aspires, like the Grail family, to recognize the supersensible, creative spirit in the universe and to make its intentions transparent. The books containing the results of his research are published by the Philosophical-Anthroposophical Publishing Co. at the Goetheanum in Dornach.*
The Grail symbol jasper refers therefore not only to the purely mineral realm, but also to the organic, to the “vitalized sheath” living in the sea during the Mesozoic, i.e. the late Lemurian epoch, whose former gel-body we find in mineralised form in the Jurassic formations.
